Only Malays can buy reserve
land
15/05/2007 NST By V. Anbalagan
PUTRAJAYA: Non-Malays who inherited Malay reserve land can only sell the
property to Malays.
The Federal Court has ruled that any such transaction involving a non-Malay
is illegal.
However, the non-Malay owner can transfer his inheritance to his
beneficiaries.
The court made these pronouncements in allowing an appeal by the legal
representatives of Lee Keng Liat to recover about RM620,000 in compensation
when the Malacca government acquired eight acres (2.6ha) of such land in
Mukim Klebang Besar to build houses about 25 years ago.
Keng Liat had acquired the land at the turn of the 20th century after he
received a certificate from the governor-in-council that entitled him to
hold the customary land.
Under the Malacca Lands Customary Rights Ordinance, only a Malay living in
the state or a person holding such certificate from the council was entitled
to inherit such property.
On Keng Liat’s death, the property was transferred to a son, Chim Giang, who
in 1935, sold the land to Tan Tai Lip.
In 1982, the authorities were ready to pay about RM1 million in compensation
to Tan’s heirs. A total of RM420,000 was paid for loss of property and
livelihood.
In 1986, Keng Liat’s personal representatives filed a suit at the Malacca
High Court, claiming that the compensation for the loss of land was
rightfully theirs.
Judge Datuk Abdul Hamid Mohamad said Tan should not have been allowed to
purchase the land as he did not have a certificate from the council.
He said the transaction was illegal due to non-compliance of the ordinance.
He said he could not validate the original sale of land "as this would
completely defeat the purpose of the creation of the Malacca customary land
and Malay reserve land".
Sitting with Hamid were Datuk Arifin Zakaria and Datuk S. Augustine Paul.
Hamid said Malay reserve land came into existence after laws were enacted in
the Malay states and the Straits Settlements to protect the land rights of
the Malays.
He said the British saw it necessary to do so.
"If at all, it is for the legislature to repeal or amend the laws, not this
court," he said of the unanimous ruling delivered on Friday.
Hamid, who wrote the 27-page judgment, said the court gave serious thought
to the issue because of "what was happening on the ground".
"Customary land and Malay reserve land may be no more than a beautiful but
empty package while the contents are enjoyed by people who are prohibited by
law to own it," he said. |